Check it out! Whitelist Rules, FINALLY.

Allow me to jam my own foot in between the door and say one thing.

-1 to your heart's content, but please, do not do so because you have not seen someone without trying to see them. Don't expect people to shine outright, specially with 40-50 people on the server. Instead, take note of their CKey, what they play, who as. And go out and find them, determine if they're whitelist material (gain an actual opinion about them, beyond just, "I've never seen you") and then comment with regards to that.

Seniors should elevate newcomers who can roleplay, guide those who are capable of learning, and only oust those who are incapable of learning. Right now, it's alot of the latter two, with not even one bit of the first. I have yet to see someone welcome a newcomer for their inround performance, pat them on the back, etc. I might be blind, but eh.

I presumed these rules were already known...although more by tongue then written word...or whatever passes for speech by OOC as tongue.

Still, good work, chip chip, and all that.

But what about rules against trying to seduce people for votes.

WHAT OF THAT.

It was enforced. Just not written down all in one place.

Hi. I really like the new whitelist apps, but. Is there any plan to replace the custom item whitelist with one that doesn't require wordwall vomit.

Thanks.

That was the original reason why I chose the 1000 word limit indeed Lessick, but Skull might have other reasons for keeping it.

Yess. You have my approval for that. I mean, if you wanted it. You're kind of the host. You can already do that if you want.

Yes.

In truth, I have no interest nor want for a custom item but I just hate wordwall apps. They're just kind of terrible, you know. And there's this great make-apps-less-awful initiative thing going on, sooo. Just thought I'd pitch in.

As a note, a new addition was made to the Head Application guidelines, to reflect better on a change we have been enforcing but that was not directly specified in the rules until now: