gt3d
Detective
Posts: 32 
|
Post by gt3d on Apr 24, 2014 15:19:22 GMT
Name: Trinity Eliza Dugmore
Age:24
Occupation: Engineer
# of Days working for NT: 840
Deaths:1
Cloned:0
Sex:3
Top Friends: Hawk Silverstone, Veronica Pauli, Barry Watson
Enemies: Adrianna Cross. Idiots.
# of Kills: 1 Corgi Puppy w/ FireAxe. 2 Carp w/ Crowbar
# of mental breakdowns:24
Greatest Achievement: Fixed the lights.
# of Major Disaster Repairs: 3
# of voices in head: 8
Time of Death: 20:40 April 24th
# of Times Brigged: 3
Biggest Regret: Killing the corgi puppy with a fireaxe. "I ax'd him a question, he didn't THUNK it through"
Only Chance of Revival:Comic book
|
|
|
|
Post by Rusty Shackleford on Apr 24, 2014 18:12:32 GMT
She doesn't need to be cloned when Ru'Sty can simply use his occult influence to raise her from the dead as one of his insane minions.
|
|
gt3d
Detective
Posts: 32
|
Post by gt3d on Apr 24, 2014 19:21:24 GMT
I would like to see that happen..just a pile of tentacled mouths screaming gibberish.
|
|
|
|
Post by nebulaflare on Apr 25, 2014 3:04:11 GMT
Hawk dragged her corpse back to Delta Commander Blaze's ship. She'll be cloned at the Delta facility. Those machines are top-notched!
|
|
gt3d
Detective
Posts: 32
|
Post by gt3d on Apr 25, 2014 7:00:49 GMT
The soul rejects it! Trinity has faded into obscurity. All the tech in the world couldn't force her will to live. Ya gotta think of somethin else.
|
|
|
|
Post by Skull132 on Apr 25, 2014 8:20:00 GMT
With the potential of sounding like an arse, allow me to ask "why"? Why use military assets created with a very specific purpose to revive a completely inexpensive worker? It is literally more trouble than it's worth.
An analogy from real life: in Afghanistan, the US does not scramble a pararescue unit to aid wounded civilians unless the wounds are DIRECTLY inflicted by US/NATO forces.
Aaaaand I'm late. The point is moot.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rusty Shackleford on Apr 25, 2014 9:58:57 GMT
RU'STY TENTACLES HER BACK TO LIFE
|
|
|
|
Post by nebulaflare on Apr 25, 2014 11:16:19 GMT
With the potential of sounding like an arse, allow me to ask "why"? Why use military assets created with a very specific purpose to revive a completely inexpensive worker? It is literally more trouble than it's worth. An analogy from real life: in Afghanistan, the US doed not scramble a pararescue unit to aid wounded civillians unless the wounds are DURECTLY inflicted by US/NATO forces. Aaaaand I'm late. The point is moot. *broods* I hate it when you make a valid point like that. |
|
